My summative reflection of 342A
Our course proved time and time again we as teachers must use a different lens when we communicate math with high school students. It goes beyond that though; once we enter the profession, how can we prevent ourselves from becoming complicit with how things
'were' within the old curriculum, and embrace the new?
Most of the pedagogy I learned was useful, outlined below:
Most of the pedagogy I learned was useful, outlined below:
Readings: I don't believe I answered most (if not all) of the blog posts sufficiently. I made some interesting remarks, but they were off topic.
Activities: The class we talked about the weight in students backpacks was something I never thought about before then. Especially now how information is distributed online, do we ultimately need books anymore?
Discussions: Sitting at hexagonal tables, our views on how to 'sub' divide different patterns of seating arrangement for students stood out with me.
Activities: The class we talked about the weight in students backpacks was something I never thought about before then. Especially now how information is distributed online, do we ultimately need books anymore?
Discussions: Sitting at hexagonal tables, our views on how to 'sub' divide different patterns of seating arrangement for students stood out with me.
Thanks for your comments, Brendan. Unfortunately, it's true that your interesting remarks didn't really have much connection with the readings! I'm glad that some of the discussions and activities were thought-provoking.
ReplyDelete